Bottom-Up or Top-Down, both Required Commitment

  • Renny Sukmono D I Customs and Excise Study Program, Polytechnic of State Finance STAN, South Tangerang City Banten Indonesia
  • Riani Budiarsih D III Tax Study Program, Polytechnic of State Finance STAN, South Tangerang City Banten Indonesia
Keywords: prognosis budget, budget realization, budget achievement, commitment, Top-Down, Bottom-Up

Abstract

One of the strategies of the Ministry of Finance is to encourage good budget management top-down by including the element of budget realization in setting the Key Performance Indicator (IKU). Determining the target budget of a year is top-down, while for budget withdrawal plan (prognosis budget) each month of the year is set bottom-up. This Prognosis budget is used as the target to be achieved by the working unit. The budget achievements show how much effort the work unit has made in achieving the targets they set themselves. Budget achievement is a comparison between the realization of the budget achieved and the target set. The smaller the budget achievement, it can be said that the commitment of the work unit to achieve the target is still low. In 2016, there are still a number of echelon I who still have a lot to do to increase this commitment. This is proved by the varying budget achievements that can be achieved by the echelon I. There is a work unit that has a very low budget achievement which is until the third quarter it only reaches 20% of the total budget, on the other hand, there is a work unit that is able to exceed the set target. Echelon I units that still have homework include Echelon I "B" and Echelon I "C".  Difficulties in coordination with the lowest level units have indeed become one of the challenges for echelon I which have agencies spread throughout the territory of Indonesia. In addition, the characteristics of different work units are also a challenge for both to be able to impose equal treatment for all work units. Intensive and periodic monitoring from the top level is really needed to increase the commitment of lower-level work units. If the lower-level does not yet have a high commitment, it is impossible for the organization's main goal to be achieved.

References

Anthony, RN dan Govindarjan. 1998. Management Control System, Ninth Edition, New York : McGraw-Hill Companies, inc.

Blocher, Edward J, K.H. Chen dan Thomas W. Lin. 2000. Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis, Edisi Indonesia. Salemba Empat, Jakarta.

Chndra, Gyan. 1992. The Behavioral Aspect of Budgetingin Sweny and Rachlin, Handbook of Budgeting. New York.

Dongoran, Johnson. Komitmen organisasi: dua sisi sebuah koin. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Vol. VII No 1. Salatiga.

Gibson, Ivncevic and Donnely. 1994. Organisasi (Perilaku, Struktur, dan Proses). Alih Bahasa : Djarkasih Jilid 1 dan 2. Erlangga:Jakarta.

Mowday, J.S Porter, L.W Steers, R.M. 1992. Employee Organization Linkages. New York, Academy Munter, Paul. 1993. The Effect of Auditors Ethical Sensitivity. Journal Behavioral Research in Accounting, Volume 5.

Steers, R. 1980. Efektifitas Organisasi. Alih Bahasa Magdalena Yamin. Erlangga:Jakarta.

Walpole, Ronald E dan Raymond H. Myers. 1995. Ilmu Peluang dan Statistika untuk Insinyur dan Ilmuwan. Bandung: ITB Bandung.

Welsch, GA Hilton, RW Dan Gordon, P.N. Budgeting : Profit Planing and Control, Fifth Edition. Printice Hall International.

Published
2019-05-24
How to Cite
Sukmono, R. and Budiarsih, R. (2019) “Bottom-Up or Top-Down, both Required Commitment”, AMAR (Andalas Management Review), 3(1), pp. 77-102. doi: 10.25077/amar.3.1.77-102.2019.
Section
Articles