Pro-Environmental Behaviour in Indonesia: What Don’t We Recognize?

  • Dudi Permana Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Fellita Irmadela Farandy Universitas Mercu Buana
  • Hasliza Abdul Halim Universiti Sains Malaysia
Keywords: Green Appearance Consciousness, Environmental Consciousness, Green-Self Identity, Pro-Environmental Behaviour


Global warming and increasing environmental pollution are caused by human behaviour These facts have driven consumer to change their behaviour to become more environment-friendly. This study aims to analyze how psychological factor, namely green appearance consciousness (X1), environmental consciousness (X2), and green-self identity (X3) influence pro-environmental behaviour (Y). This research belongs to causal associations research. The data were obtained from 130 people, who implemented zero-waste lifestyle. In this study we used Partial Least Square analysis method to measure relationship between variables. The result shows that green appearance consciousness (X1) and environmental consciousness (X2) have significant influences to pro-environmental, while green self-identity (X3) does not have significant influences to pro-environmental behaviour (Y).



Adnan, A., Ahmad, A., & Khan, M. (2017). Examining The Role of Consumer Lifestyles on Ecological Behavior Among Young Indian Consumers. Young Consumers, 18(4), 348–377. DOI: 10.1108/yc-05-2017-00699

Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty Years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A New Meta-analysis of Psycho-social Determinants of Pro-environmental Behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27 (1), 14-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002.

Barbarossa, C., et al. (2015). A self-identity based model of electric car adoption intention: A cross-cultural comparative study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 149-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.001

Bator, R. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: The Application of Persuasion Theory to the Development Of Effective Proenvironmental Public Service Announcements. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 527–541. DOI:10.1111/0022-4537.00182.

Boztepe, A. (2012). Green Marketing and Its Impact on Consumer Buying Behavior. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies, 5 (1). DOI: 10.1177/2319510X1200800106.

CNN Indonesia. 2019. Jakarta Diklaim Bisa Hasilkan Rp1,75 T per Hari dari Sampah. Diunduh dari:

D’Amico, M., Di Vita, G., & Monaco, L. (2016). Exploring Environmental Consciousness and Consumer Preferences for Organic Wines Without Sulfites. Journal of Cleaner Production. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.014.

Darmajati, D. (2018). Data Mengerikan soal Sampah Plastik di Lautan. Diunduh dari :

Dermody, J., Hanmer-Lloyd, S., Koenig-Lewis, N., & Zhao, A. L. (2015). Advancing Sustainable Consumption in the UK and China: The Mediating Effect of Pro-environmental Self-identity. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(13-14), 1472–1502. DOI:10.1080/0267257x.2015.1061039.

Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stren, P. (2003). The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science 302, 1907. DOI: 10.1126/science.1091015.

Dono, J., Webb, J., & Richardson, B. (2009). The Relationship Between Environmental Activism, Pro-environmental Behaviour and Social Identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 178–186. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.006.

Eidi, F., & Shahbazi, A. (2017). Effective Factors on Consumers’ Decision to Buy Green Products. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11 (1), 795-807.

Filho, E., Cardoso, B., & Barboza, M,. (2017). Motivations behind green consumption and the influence of environmental consciousness on consumer behaviour. International Journal Innovation and Sustainable Development, 11 (2/3), 291 – 308. DOI: 10.1504/IJISD.2017.083298

Gatersleben, B., Murthag, N., & Abrahamse, W. (2014). Values, Identity and Pro-environmental Behaviour. Contemporary Social Science, Vol. 9, No. 4, 374–392. DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2012.682086.

Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, Use, and Fate of All PlasticsEever Made. Science Advances, 3 (7), e1700782. DOI:10.1126/sciadv.1700782

Gkargkavouz, A., Halkos, G., & Matsiori, S. (2019). Environmental behavior in a private-sphere context: Integrating theories of planned behavior and value belief norm, self-identity and habit. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 148, 145–156. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.039.

Grankvist, G., Dahlstrand, U., & Biel, A. (2004). The Impact of Environmental Labelling on Consumer Preference : NegativeVs. Positive Labels. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27: 213-230. DOI:10.1023/b:copo.0000028167.54739.9

Greenpeace Indonesia. (2018). Lebih dari 90% Merek Garam yang Disampel Secara Global Ditemukan Mengandung Mikroplastik. Diunduh dari :

Hashim, N., Yahya, W., Bakar, S., & Asrul, S. (2018). Social Influence and Eco-label Factors Towards Purchase Intention of Home Products: A PLS Approach. Journal of Emerging Economies & Islamic Research, 6 (3), 39– 47.

Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors Affecting Green Purchase Behaviour and Future Research Directions. International Strategic Management, 3, 128–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001.

How to Cite
Permana, D., Farandy, F. I. and Halim, H. A. (2023) “Pro-Environmental Behaviour in Indonesia: What Don’t We Recognize?”, AMAR (Andalas Management Review), 7(1), pp. 62-78. doi: 10.25077/amar.7.1.62-78.2023.